NLP eye accessing cues and the importance of calibrating on the subject. By watching the eye movements and noting the direction of where the subject is looking, it is possible to gain an understanding of what the subject may be remembering or construcing; whether it is a feeling, sound or picture or if they are working something out in their mind. Note how, in this video, the subject has issues accessing the Auditory Recall area. Terry touches on clearing this area using “eye movement de-sensitisation” to help clear out problematic areas at the end (this is the subject of another video!). Visit http://www.NLPworld.co.uk for info on NLP training and NLP MP3 products.
Duration : 0:7:58
March 5th, 2010 at 11:32 pm
It always …
It always fascinates me why some people think antiquated primordial science is more accurate or less ignorant than modern medical science. Yes, medicine has become more complex (and all science for that matter) but don’t let that retard the growth of human knowledge.
Ancient peoples (e.g. Greeks, Egyptions, etc.) have done wonders to advance human knowledge, but we’ve studied them and refined their ideas to more precisely fit reality! Some day people will do the same for our idea’s.
March 5th, 2010 at 11:32 pm
ur mother is useless
ur mother is useless
March 5th, 2010 at 11:32 pm
That may be true in …
That may be true in THEORY, yet I work with phobias, cancer patients, that the men in white coats have no answers for! You can’t just do positive thinking on cancer or phobias, yet I can get a stranger and release a phobia in less than 30 minutes. I am more interested in early scientists (Egypt and further back), who were scientific observers and used experiential evidence in equal order. The experience of love has more learning than any ‘scientific’ rendering. Experience and research equally
March 5th, 2010 at 11:32 pm
Also, you are …
Also, you are presupposing you can’t be fooled. You are claiming that if I see an effect then it is there but what if you are seeing an effect because your brain is created a pattern out of random noise? People do this frequently and it should be simple to eliminate this variable.
If this is real, then why not test how accurate it is by doing a very simple scientific experiment? You seem to be convinced of a conclusion and don’t care about the evidence – qualities of an ideologue.
March 5th, 2010 at 11:32 pm
Can you provide a …
Can you provide a reference number to those studies; I can not find it. The kind of research you are belittling created this modern society. It is the only method that has shown to discover Truths (not absolute) about our universe. Those who don’t like being tested by the scientific method (e.g. psychics, homeopaths, astrologers) is generally because their phenomena doesn’t exist.
If you really are trying to discover and isolate this effect then you should use the scientific method.
March 5th, 2010 at 11:32 pm
What i am saying is …
What i am saying is check it out for yourself. Your own research. The eye patterns of NLP have been extensively researched by Robert Dilts 25 years ago. The research took two years and in some respect is used in a technique called EMDR, which uses eye patterns to sync different parts of the brain. The kind of ‘research’ done in the name of science by guys sitting round at desks or in test tubes is not the type i prefer to give authority to. Please try out for yourselves, then give judgment.
March 5th, 2010 at 11:32 pm
Science works by …
Science works by experimentation. I.e. experimentation is the work-horse of science. I have done extensive research on NLP and it shows many red flags of pseudoscience. I also do research at Oklahoma State University and this video is no where close to being justification of the proposed effects. Even if you don’t have a mechanism, I will still believe the effect if predications can be satisfied.
Did Claire know she was being tested? May I ask some more questions about your methodology?
March 5th, 2010 at 11:32 pm
NLP is about …
NLP is about experimentation as well as being a science. Check it out for yourself. I don’t ask anyone to believe me about anything. You must research before making conclusions. We could have faked this session with Claire but I’ve left in all the bits that didn’t quite work as well as those that did.
March 5th, 2010 at 11:32 pm
Please do a …
Please do a literature search for NLP. You’ll be surprised to find that it really doesn’t exist in psychological journals!
NLP is something magicians use to fool people into thinking they actually have these peculiar powers. No one believes the magician is really levitating or vanishing but most audience members are just gullible enough to believe in NLP.
March 5th, 2010 at 11:32 pm
wtf? this sux …
wtf? this sux useless like obama
March 5th, 2010 at 11:32 pm
SO! useful xx
SO! useful xx
March 5th, 2010 at 11:32 pm
@heartthehorse Wow. …
@heartthehorse Wow. You are right. He is programming her to respond how he wants her to. When he first mentions how she listens to herself around 4:05 he immediately praises her when she looks in the ‘appropriate’ direction before she even has time to process the request. This video is a really an example of operant conditioning.
March 5th, 2010 at 11:32 pm
but she almost …
but she almost never used her audio part of the brain, and the glitch should indicate that she hasn’t a very strong audio”capasity”. but Im picking up that the guy says her audio i dominant, or am I getting it wrong? according to me she is strong with pictures. thanks
March 5th, 2010 at 11:32 pm
you have to …
you have to understtand them, if they are truly organised allways neat and pre planing chances are their using auditory recall or visual recall … i could be wrong and if you disagree with what i said please reply and answer why
March 5th, 2010 at 11:32 pm
to figure out how …
to figure out how someone is lieing you have to understand them and who their are and combine this with the knowing of theese eye movments and im sure you can figure this out
March 5th, 2010 at 11:32 pm
After Sam tells tom …
After Sam tells tom he’s not feeling well he should be asked another question like “How are you feeling?” or “What are the symptoms?” this way if the lie is not thought out he will have to go to construct.
March 5th, 2010 at 11:33 pm
The above was …
The above was supposed to be a response to cooperm. Occasionally people are wired “backwards”. Don’t tell the person you are mapping them when you casually ask a question re their past, recent or otherwise. A pre-planned lie will still appear in their constructed/future zone, or they may look down to check how they feel about what they are saying. there will be a difference.
March 5th, 2010 at 11:33 pm
Notice how he …
Notice how he appears when he has no reason to lie ( map him ), then notice a change. For instance, someone was telling me a list of things they had done during the prior weekend. As she did she seemed comfortably making eye contact with me. Only while mentioning one activity, she looked down and away. I said I didn’t know why, but that she was uncomfortable regarding the bookstore. Turned out it was she was purposely omitting the fact it was a Christian bookstore. Mapping or calibrating.
March 5th, 2010 at 11:33 pm
heis constantly …
heis constantly giving her cues as to what he wants her to do, and then rewarding her. how many times does he say thats great to her? its hard to tell if there is anything relly going on.
March 5th, 2010 at 11:33 pm
Does Claire play a …
Does Claire play a musical instrument? As I was thinking, is there is a link between people who play a musical instrument and audio remembering. Would you see clearer indications in these audio zones if someone was musical? Has there been any case studies on this?
March 5th, 2010 at 11:33 pm
Going by the eye …
Going by the eye accessing cue chart being 100% correct. If Jane tells Tom to lie to Sam that she wasnt feeling well as she didnt want to go to the cinema, what would Toms eye movement do.
would i be correct in saying there would be no AC as there is a prearranged lie so you would surely see AR, as he is recalling what she said. So how could you detect a lie
March 5th, 2010 at 11:33 pm
The letters that …
The letters that light up are where she is supposed to be looking. As you can see, she doesn’t always go to those places immediately This video is not for research as we know the eye patterns are accurate, it’s to give people an idea of eye patterns so you can work with clients more easily. Mostly useful in natural surroundings. When the eyes go to different quadrants they are seeing pictures listening to sounds, remembering data etc. Not useful to the everyday person not working with clients..
March 5th, 2010 at 11:33 pm
Basically this …
Basically this video shows that Eye Accessing Cues technique barely works and if it does its very random and not reliable.
March 5th, 2010 at 11:33 pm
To be honest, I …
To be honest, I think the only reason this information hasn’t been proven yet is because they do tests like this, and the subjects consciously know what’s going on… If you were to randomly ask a question, I think that the subject would in fact make some kind of eye pattern. Everyone differs… And that’s why it’s important on getting to know someone beforehand before they find out which representational system the subject prefers… I know this isn’t possible for therapists mind you.
March 5th, 2010 at 11:33 pm
I noticed that she …
I noticed that she had a tendency to look at you. I think that could have interfered with the readings. She was nervous, and instinctively trying to check out YOUR body language to understand what was going on. So that’s why her eyes kept shifting to the left.